Rob Bagby will be in town on October 23 to host an MSDN event titled Demystifying the Code. You can find complete details including a registration link at http://blogs.msdn.com/bags/archive/2008/10/02/msdn-unleashed-event-in-salt-lake-city-on-october-23rd.aspx. The first 50 people to come to the event will be getting a copy of the book Applications = Code + Markup by Charles Petzold.

The session will cover some of the latest technologies from Microsoft including WPF, Silverlight 2, and Visual Studio 2008 SP1. The event is being held at the Microsoft offices in Salt Lake City.

If you need more incentive to sign up for PDC now Microsoft has announced that they will be distributing "the bits" on an external USB drive. There will be some software that will be available in a CTP or beta version but there is other exclusive content.

There will be many things that are only available at PDC including the ability to interact with the people who are developing Microsoft's cloud and Software + Services offerings. We are also hearing that we will be the first to get the pre-beta version of Windows 7.

I got sent an e-mail with the subject "did you see this?" and a link to an article with the title "IBM May Quit Technology Standards Bodies". I did some more research and found the following articles about the story

http://management.silicon.com/government/0,39024677,39293016,00.htm?r=1

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/IBM-standards-business-practice,6403.html

http://www.nytimes.com/idg/IDG_852573C400693880002574CD0027DDFF.html?ref=technology

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10048497-92.html

The articles seem to speak around the same general points which I summarize as follows:
1. IBM is concerned about the perceived value of standards that are not widely agreed upon.
2. IBM wants to make sure that they are using their influence to ensure that the standards that are created are ones that a majority of the industry can agree upon and that will get wide adoption.
3. There is a concern that if the standards bodies are not respected there will be a proliferation of standards or an abandonment of standards which would be bad for the entire industry.

I agree that if people loose faith in the standardization process we will soon cease to have standards. I agree with the stance that each standards body (to be respected) needs to have a well documented process for reviewing proposals and resolving differing opinions. Those processes need to have checks and balances that will make sure that minority opinions are not ignored while at the same time not allowing a minority to completely stop progress on a specification. Those rules should be different for each standards body as they are dealing with different topics with differing levels of impact on the industry and differing levels of contention between the participants.

As the cnet article points out IBM has also been accused of manipulating standards bodies for their gain so I don't see this so much as IBM threatening the standards bodies or reacting to the OOXML specification so much as IBM saying that we need to make sure that there is not another instance where a standard is approved without having been properly vetted in the community to the point that different national standards bodies are complaining about the results.

When I fired up the Zune client this morning to listen to my podcasts I was told that there is a newer version. I updated the client software first on my machine and then upgraded my Zune. There were several things that I liked:

1. I think the new interface is cleaner and easier to navigate.
2. New podcasts in the marketplace. They may have been there before but I found it easier to navigate around and find what I want.
3. Mixview in the Zune Social. Here is the view for my Zune. I did notice that it only shows the recent items played on the Zune and not from the desktop client.
   
4. Games added to my Zune. I haven't had time to play them but I figure over the next couple of weeks there will be some down time to check them out.
5. Easier setup than iTunes. This issue should probably be a different post but I really don't want to blog vile when I only have 1 try behind me as I might have been the problem. The short version is that I set up iTunes for my son and was very disappointed by the lack of keyboard support in the setup program.
6. Audiobooks - I know this has been a very requested feature as I have talked to other users. Now you can download and transfer books from audible.com and overdrive.com.
   

There are some things I didn't like:

1. I had to remove the "friends" that were added for me in the Zune social. I don't know how they were chosen since I didn't recognize one song or artist from my "friends" and removed them.
2. I was told in the upgrade that WiFi would be turned on. When I checked it wasn't so I don't know if it was turned on as part of the upgrade and then set back to it's previous setting (that would be a good thing) or something didn't work like planned (a bad thing).

I am looking forward to many more hours of music from my Zune.

So if you haven't been living in a cave you have been hearing about the Microsoft ads with Jerry Seinfeld. I have even blogged about it. Well with the news that Jerry wouldn't be appearing any more there was a lot of talk about the campaign failing and Microsoft changing direction.

Now there are a few new commercials on http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/windows/videoGallery.aspx along with an executive video by Bill Veghte explaining more about the "Life Without Walls" strategy.

If you want you can get into the act as well by uploading your video that explains why you are a PC and why you are proud of it.

This is a reminder that next Wednesday we will be holding out monthly meeting of the Utah County .NET User Group (UCNUG). It will be held at the NuSkin building at 1175 S 350 E in Provo. Aaron Zupancic will be speaking to us on the design time experience of WinForms controls.

There was a lot of comment about the Bill Gates and Jerry Seinfeld commercial. There are now two more "yet to be aired" commercials posted at http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/windows/. You can also see them as one big commercial (4:33) at http://www.windows.com. I am not a marketing genius although I have been accused of being a marketing professional (and have the e-mail to prove it). I am not sure I know exactly where they are going but I think I start to see a glimmer and my guess would be that we will start seeing things like the xBox, Live Mesh, the Tablet PC, and yes, Windows Vista start showing up more often in the ads. If nothing else it is nice to see Bill Gates not taking himself seriously.

I posted yesterday on Google's new browser named "Chrome". Today I have see a lot of news articles and blog posts about the browser. In general the feeling seems to be that the browser is fast, has a lot of good features, and is squarely aimed at taking market share from Microsoft. Not only will it hurt IE if Chrome gets a lot of play but it will also affect Windows as the browser will become the application platform.

There was a lot of talk about the EULA (you know the thing you never read but click the "I agree" button so you can get on with installing software). In particular the agreement granted Google a license to use anything you used in the browser. There was a wide range of reactions from "this is standard practice to keep Google from being sued, they would never use your stuff" to "that means they can capture and post the details of my on-line banking session to the world. I am deleting this as fast as I can". Whether they were intending to do anything with the data or not is unclear to me but in an article on arstechnica.com Google admitted it was a mistake and promised to change the license to retroactively not grant them any rights.

There is a bigger issue though and that is the Omnibox on each tab. The arstechnica article links to another article on cnet.com that states "Chrome's "Omnibar" can also access all keystrokes a user types, and Google will store some of this information along with IP addresses". This sounds like the kind of scenario I wrote about back in 2005 where AJAX is used to send your keystrokes to a server even if you don't ever actually hit the enter key. I have not found any mention of Google deciding to stop this practice in the future so I guess I will stay away from using Chrome until I have a better feel for what privacy I am giving up. I like the idea of having it suggest information to me, I just don't want Google storing that information.